A Funeral

I hugged Jeanette in the funeral home hallway. She said, “God gives and takes away, but it’s so very hard.” Her husband Doug was in the bathroom. I asked her how he was, she said, “Not too bad, he knows something’s happened, but he says outrageous things sometimes.” He came out and I said, “Hi Doug.” Doug said, “Hi Hansome”, and I remembered Jeanette’s words. Jeanette then introduced me to the man I had worked beside at Hope Mission for over ten years. Doug and I shook hands.

I made my way to a chapel pew and waited through organ and piano solos for the service to start. I recognized some Enya.

Why did I feel so uncomfortable while the pastor gave his sermon? It was, after all, Doug and Janet Green’s pastor and he was speaking at the funeral of their forty-some year old son Donald.

For all the pastor’s references to time in this life being fleeting, it sure wasn’t when he got hold of it. No bombast, just slow steady sermonizing.

And then I sat there asking myself where my gracelessness came from? But I couldn’t help it. The principle text was the Lazarus story…and how Christ said, he was dead…yet he lives. So the refrain was that Don was dead, yet he lives. It’s a comforting Christian belief. But the repetition that was employed reads almost like an evasion of death, no real allowance or time to grieve through it.

So the well-meaning pastor spoke theology. Dragged out proof texts about everlasting life. About how to get. And how important it is to think about it on a day like this. And there were life-is-precious proof texts, life-is-fragile proof texts…and always the hanging explication that a time like this should remind us of life’s precious and fragile nature etc. All beautiful texts handled pedantically.

The best moment in the sermon was while the pastor paraphrased a Psalm. “The grass is green but it withers and dies.”, at which time Doug piped up and said, “Hey, my name is Green!” I’m sure he would have said more except for the embarrassed shushes.

No embarrassment necessary. However I imagine the pastor was relieved to hear the shushes. You can’t have old men with Alzheimer’s taking coherent runs at a good Plymouth Brethren sermon. Not when the stakes are this high and you’ve got a chapel full of pagans. But then I imagine him reprimanding himself for playing fast and loose with the Psalm. There’s no “green” in it, as far as I recall, just “grass”.

But thank God for genuine human moments. A truer form of theology. The family spoke of Don’s life, of their memories. Spoke wonderfully, beautifully, and we were overcome.

There was mercy here. It came shining through the stories from Don’s siblings. It came through the description of Don’s “grumpy love”, as he sat by his younger brother helping him break an addiction. It came through his sister’s description of Don’s unassailable curiosity.

Two brothers and a sister told us of a life lived in quiet wonder, a dozen global trips. We heard of a man who read deep into history, especially Celtic and Druid history. They told us of his ploughing through a couple degrees, then learning French, and Portuguese, and traveling some more. And then, winding up working for Alberta Employment and Human Resources, finding ways to help everyday workers. Judging from the number of colleagues there, Don Green made a mark.

Donny, as his mom called him, was no dissembler, he believed with a passion. But my suspicion is that he didn’t believe the way the pastor wanted us to believe he believed. Not that Don didn’t believe what he wrote and signed in his Gideon New Testament that the pastor kept holding up. Not at all. By accounts, he believed passionately, just differently.

While he might have been a bit embarrassed at times for the scores of friends co-workers who packed the chapel, he would, I think, have loved his mother’s prayer that asked the right question. Janet prayed: “Why God, did you take him? And yet, we bless your name. Still, why do you give and take away?” Tomorrow will bring its own questions. Today was the day for this question.

Another Path

The following “comment” from Connie Howard is too good to leave languishing in the comment section.

Connie responds to Rediscovered Gospel

This is for readers out there potentially discouraged about their inability to spiritual discipline, their inadequate interest in things spiritual, and in many cases, their powerfully negative emotional reactions to language of the church or of self-sacrifice.

Steve talks about spiritual disciplines that have been instrumental in his life, and says they are a good way of keeping desire alive and opening the door to rediscovery and new understanding of the gospel. I’d like to propose yet another path by which we can rediscover the gospel.

I spent so many years, too many, berating myself for my inadequate practice of spiritual disciplines, until I learned from Kathleen Norris that in fact all our actions have holiness potential, and that the quotidian hum of domestic and family life are in fact spiritual acts if we see them as such. And more recently, from Ronald Rolheiser and from my own experience, I’ve discovered that going to work, or reading the newspaper or reading the writings of theologians as they try to put words to the mysteries of God, or reading novelists and poets who try put words to the mysteries of human experience, or listening to a child, or sharing a glass of wine and conversation and laughter with friends, are spiritual acts also. Not spiritual disciplines technically, but serving the same purpose.

The gospel is about Incarnation, so to take the time to pay attention to the heart-break and joy of the world around me as told in the face of a child or a friend or a spouse or a parent, or in the news, or in a novel is very spiritual, and becomes an avenue for rediscovering the gospel, for allowing it, the message of grace and incarnation, as Steve says, to read me.

Sundance Gratitude

Then Jesus asked, “Were not ten made clean? But the other nine, where are they? Was none of them found to return and give praise to God except this foreigner?”

When I was manager at the Men’s shelter we often served a man named Sundance. He was a troubled man; but when sober he was the most polite, grateful, and gracious person you would want to meet. I prefer to think that this was who he was.

Anybody who has volunteered or worked “down at the mission”, even for a day will have met a Sundance.

I wonder sometimes, why it is that someone like Sundance was so grateful. He had little to nothing, and had taken away–at one time–what he did have; so why would he remain thankful?

Why is it that so many of us who go through life “earning” our way, slide into a half-conscious “I’m owed what’s coming to me”, frame of reference?

Lisa S. alluded to this attitude when pointing out the differences between a banquet put on for donors and a banquet we put on for the street. (Hope Mission had it’s Spring banquet last weekend.) She pointed out that of course there are practical and logistical reasons for some of these differences…location of the venue, the size of the event and so on.

But–keeping in mind that this is a generalization–it was this one difference that stuck out, a starker one that earned no justification: It’s like we believe the Jesus-gospel but adopt a John Adams-entitlement outlook.

Now I’m off to look in the mirror.

Rediscovered Gospel

The Hasidim tell the story of the disciple who said to the teacher, “Teacher, I have gone completely through the Torah. What must I do now? And the teacher said, “Oh, my friend, the question is not, have you gone through the Torah. The question is, has the Torah gone through you?”

Yesterday the pastor of Edmonton’s First Baptist Church named for me the shift that is happening in my life. Pastor Tim Colborne described his journey as focused, for many years, on the liturgical life, and on the spiritual disciplines. But that over the past three years he has been drawn into a rediscovery of the gospel.

His experience parallels my own. For the past decade, my (Benedictine) spiritual journey has been focused on the the ancient disciplines. Even when practised inconsistently, as is my habit, and always imperfectly, which is my inclination, they have nevertheless been a well-spring. But during the past couple of years I have been nudged and redirected toward the gospels.

I’m hardly unique. I think the rediscovery of the gospel is inevitable in any “God-desiring” process. The disciplines are simply a good way of keeping desire alive.

The rediscovered gospel, or, “meeting Jesus again for the first time”, as Marcus Borg would say, are the experiences of seekers uneasy and unimpressed by formulaic Christian faith. Seekers who leave off being tourists and desire some kind of sustained existential immersion in the gospel, which they come to embrace as the crux of everything.

For me the rediscovered gospel is an earthy discovery. It’s a discovery of Jesus, not as propitiatory sacrifice, but as ultimate self-giver, who exposes and forgives my ways of self-security through violence. The gospel rediscovered moves me from tourist to resident. The gospel is no longer read by me. I am read by the gospel.Â