Hand to Hand Contact

I taught myself to type while working in a grain elevator in Spruce Grove, Alberta. It was the summer my son Lucas was rescued by an emergency-response-team helicopter after an eight hour search in the thick boreal forest of Long Lake. And I needed to write about it. I had been journaling longhand for years but I thought that the momentous drama of the incident required something more then my cursive script.

Across the tracks and across main street from the Alberta Wheat Pool elevator was a second-hand store. They had a typewriter–a sporty blue Corona. Computers had hit the market but were still the size of filing cabinets.

I used a computer for my work. It didn't have a "word processor"–still a foreign term. I used it to enter data on grain weights and grades under peoples names. All of its bulk–with its spinning 14k hard drive discs the size of dinner plates–was in the basement. On my desk on the the main floor sat a 12 inch green-screen-monitor and keyboard. They were connected to the humming monster in the cellar with cords the size of garden hoses. The small blue Corona on the other hand was portable. I could throw it in the back seat and drive to Chickakoo park, find a picnic table, and peck away with the birds.

But the pecking seemed eternal. The flow came hard. I used a book, learned what fingers belonged to what keys. But I typed and whited out and typed some more, and slowly, I typed out the story of Lucas getting lost.

Years passed, we got a 286 IBM personal-computer. I met Mavis Beacon, installed her and she scored my typing speed on the computer monitor. The day came when I got to 30, sometimes 40 words per minute, this was fast enough for me and I left Mavis to strike out on my own.

I like keyboards. I like the sound and feel of them. I'm getting picky now. I could never go back to the half-inch key stroke of my old Corona, but I do miss it.

Author Madeline L'Engle was once asked how she wrote all her stories, all her wonderful prose. She replied, "With my hands." I knew instantly what she meant.

For me, it's all about the keyboard. All about hands and fingers on keyboards. All about a tactile experience.

Yesterday, Andrea, an Acupuncturist, gave me a hand massage. She began with my left. She rubbed oil into my forearm and wrist and then drew it out to the tips of my fingers. With her thumbs she applied pressure beginning at he centre of my palm, slowly relieving any tension in the bones and ligaments in my hand.

Then she took a pencil-like instrument with a round silver tip and began to slowly trace things on the back of my hands. Pictures maybe. With variable but steady pressure, she inscribed things into the palm of my hand. She used punctuation, lots of semi-colons, commas, and periods. She wrote a paragraph on the heel of my hand and a chapter along my fingers. And it felt like I was getting reconnected from within.

Now, this morning I can't help thinking how important a hand shake is. I mean a genuine hand shake. Today I know better why it is that people on the street who approach and ask for money, more often than not, before extending their hand palm-up, put out their hand signaling a hand-shake. It's an semi-conscious human desire for connection. Human and spiritual connection.

Consider the Poor

Happy are those who consider the poor; …they are called happy in the land. (Psalm 41)

I’m still thinking about the “Poetry Night” last Friday. And now I recall this journal entry from a morning in March:

Kitty-corner from my morning lookout sits a commissioned inspiration. The artwork looks like giant panpipes. The piece has stood there, according to my memory, for over two years. I have never heard the pipes make a sound even on the days when you have to lean into a wind as you cross 109th.

But upon closer inspection I see that every pipe has a diagonal opening cut close to its top, making the pipes look more like very large penny-whistles. So unless by some meteorological anomaly the wind bears down from above with gale-speed, these poor vertical pipes will remain mute. As art, interesting to some, curious to others, and an abstraction to the rest.

Such is the lot of the first-nations man I now see crossing Jasper. He’s wearing a donated varsity jacket brown with age and blue jeans shiny with street-silt. He walks by using the weight and momentum of his torso to throw each leg out in front of him by turns. The limbs don’t seem to belong to him. People pass by. He’s interesting to some, curious to others, and an abstraction to the rest.

Happy are those who consider the poor…

The Da Vinci Code and Pop Culture

Just now there is great version of "Route 66" coming over the Starbucks speakers. Sounds like guitar great Pat Metheny and Oscar Peterson. But I'm guessing.

I have two friends that would be able to tell me if I was right. They could inform me, not only who the band members are, but the previous groups they each played in, dates of their recordings and most any other "relevant trivia's". They are music-encyclopedias and Pop Culture aficionados. However both are sharp observers and as such have been able to keep themselves from getting sucked into the pop-cult fray–I think–but then don't we all think we are above the things we critique? (They'll forgive me if they read this.)

I also have a pastor friend who is an astute student of Pop Culture. His skill at penetrating, poking fun, and also seeing some of the redemptive aspects of pop culture won him a cross-Canada contest and he now does movie reviews for CBC's DNTO. He takes the thing about being in the world but not of it seriously. He'll also be the first to admit that he struggles with walking this line. Don't we all?

He'll tell you that the less redemptive quality of Pop Culture is the emphasis of quantity over quality, speed over longevity, the fleeting and temporal over the patient and durable, and the attractive and beautiful over beauty. Also, Pop Culture celebrates their definition of Success with gusto–of course with a token allowance for failure-as-route-to success. I'm thinking there will soon be an award show for the best award show. What all this adds up to is that Pop Culture's overarching obsession has to do with not-lacking, or if you prefer, with lacking lack.

This is why, while Jesus has always been incomprehensible, in the eyes of Pop Culture this incomprehensibility has been stretched to an extreme.

And so this is my round about way of coming to comment on the already over-commented-on Da Vinci Code. (Is this not a sign of falling prey to the fray?) The Edmonton Journal (Saturday, Religion) cited a stat that 22 percent of Albertans believe The Da Vinci Code's reinterpretation of Jesus' life. And apparently it's popularity–and as a result this statistic–has not yet crested.

The Jesus of "The Da Vinci Code" fits with Pop Culture. I believe this is the seductive quality of the supposedly contriversial ideas behind the novel. We can understand a Jesus who gets in over his head religiously and politically and so conspires with the reigning powers, helping him to skip town and go on to live out a relatively normal life. But we can't make heads or tails of a person that chooses voluntary poverty, chooses misunderstanding, chooses to become our victim, chooses everything that smacks of abject lack and failure. We don't have the cognitive machinery to conceive of anyone signing up for a life like this. We do however have the machinery to accept and even perpetuate a rollicking conspiracy.