Barak Obama’s Inauguration speech

While a segment of Americans were offended by President Barak Obama’s call to enter adulthood, to wit…

We remain a young nation, but in the words of Scripture, the time has come to set aside childish things.  —- What is required of us now is a new era of responsibility —- The question we ask today is not whether our government is too big or too small, but whether it works —- As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals. —- We will restore science to its rightful place…

Obama's inaugural speech…the majority, apparently agreed, took time for reflection and found some  concrete hope in their President’s Inauguration speech.

My single grievance with Obama’s inauguration speech is with the following conjunction of war and economy, with an admission on one side, but not the other:

Our nation is at war, against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred. Our economy is badly weakened, a consequence of greed and irresponsibility on the part of some, but also our collective failure to make hard choices and prepare the nation for a new age.

No question, taking ownership of a failing economy is easier, less upsetting, than taking ownership of America’s own part in violence and hatred.

But then this reflection on what earlier generations understood, seemed to fill in some of that omission.

They understood that our power alone cannot protect us, nor does it entitle us to do as we please. Instead, they knew that our power grows through its prudent use; our security emanates from the justness of our cause, the force of our example, the tempering qualities of humility and restraint.

And then this promise to watch and wait for:

We will begin to responsibly leave Iraq to its people, and forge a hard-earned peace in Afghanistan. With old friends and former foes, we will work tirelessly to lessen the nuclear threat…

And finally, the broadest reach an American president has taken so far: viz.

A For we know that our patchwork heritage is a strength, not a weakness. We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus — and non-believers. We are shaped by every language and culture, drawn from every end of this Earth; and because we have tasted the bitter swill of civil war and segregation, and emerged from that dark chapter stronger and more united, we cannot help but believe that the old hatreds shall someday pass; that the lines of tribe shall soon dissolve; that as the world grows smaller, our common humanity shall reveal itself; and that America must play its role in ushering in a new era of peace.

These, for me, are the lines with the salt in them. The hope seasoned lines that I pray we can all taste and share –  that perhaps even our own parliament might emulate.

Christians for Active Nonviolence

CforAN3(sm)I’m under no illusions. Active nonviolence is a sputtering process in most lives. It certainly is in mine.

But having come, over the past number of years, against my own will, to hold that their is no such thing as "just war," and to believe that pacifism is the only coherent position possible for a Christian, I’ve put something out there that I hope will be of some substance.

 

Christians for Active Nonviolence

Christians for Active Nonviolence on Facebook. 

 

martin-luther-king2 Today we remember one of Christendom’s great nonviolent resistors:

"I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality… I believe that unarmed truth and unconditional love will have the final word."

 

Confidence in the divine image

On June 11, 1963, Thomas Merton wrote a letter to Jacque Maritain:

…we live in an atmosphere in which the very real concept of negotiation cannot possibly be taken seriously. But one of the real messages of Pacem in Terris is that to be a Christian today one must be able to have enough confidence in the divine image in human nature to believe that there can be some vestige of truthfulness in man and to act accordingly. For the first step is going to have to be a serious indication that we are willing to trust an enemy, even in an issue that may involve our own survival. Inability to do this means the end of our civilization. That is the problem in a nutshell.

Consider now the intransigence of Zionism and Christian Zionism with Rabbi Yisroel Weiss’ view:

Fire on 114

It’s spruce that he’s burning. Five split pieces about 18 inches long. They’re cradled in an iron grate that stands a few inches above the armor rock base. The back of the fireplace appears to be cinder block.

It’s a healthy fire. The wood is cured and dry but with enough water and resin remaining to create some snapping and crackling.

In seven minutes a plaid-sleeved arm reaches in and moves the logs with a poker. The fire responds to the repositioning. Six minutes later the hand is back. The blue cuff is buttoned. The hand around the poker shows moderate age. The knuckles are smooth. This time two pieces are flipped, and a third and fourth tamped against the others. One piece is added to the right side where hot coals set it ablaze in no time.

Twelve more minutes and one more split piece of spruce is added to the fire’s left side. For a moment, a lone flame strobes on the bark then goes out. At the crotch of two crossed logs is a bright purple flame. And there is more purple as the fire intensifies.

In four minutes the fire is what it was when I began watching it. It will loop again in 29 minutes.

It’s still dark. Somewhere in the early morning. My flu has lifted marginally. I slept most of yesterday away while the fire looped 49.6 times.

Technorati Tags: